MLS EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHwww.mlsjournals.com/ISSN: 2603-5820 |
Educational Research Journal 2017, Vol 1 n. 1;
Margarita Alcaide Risoto, Pilar Aguilar López, Nuria Cantero Rodríguez
Abstract
In an increasingly competitive and individualistic world it is of the utmost importance to know the influence that self-esteem has on the classroom. To do this, from an early age it is very important to educate and motivate students so that in spite of not being perfect and not standing out in their daily activities, they know that they are unique, which is why they should esteem themselves from a tender age.
For all these reasons, parents, educators and teachers play a key role in the development of children’ self-esteem.
When a child has enough self-esteem, the child is motivated with any ongoing activities and is not afraid to make mistakes because the child is aware that mistakes are a part of learning, this will be a student with good self-esteem prepared to overcome any challenge.
Therefore, it is necessary for our students to have a self-esteem as great as possible and to this end, it will be required to know them well and let them express themselves freely so as not to make false value judgments and fall into the famous Pygmalion effect.
At present, children spend more time in school, so teachers have a very important role because not only are we mere information transmitters, but we also have a fundamental role in teaching students emotional education.
Children's feelings about themselves are created from their relationships with others and the messages they receive in different everyday situations, influencing their school performance to a greater or lesser extent. The students’ personal problems will also have a negative impact on their learning processes, so constant communication between teachers and families is essential.
The self-esteem
Depending on the author or the information source, different definitions for self-esteem can be found:
“Positive self-esteem is the fundamental requirement for a full life." (Branden, 1991, p. 9).
Self-esteem is the self-trust and self-respect and shows the value judgments we do about ourselves to cope with everyday challenges.
Also García; Cermeño and Fernández (1991, p.10) define it as "the way we perceive, think, feel and behave about and with ourselves. It is how we are used to cope with ourselves and evaluate our own identity".
Thus, self-esteem refers to an attitude toward oneself, generated in the interaction with others, which includes the perception, esteem and concept that everyone has of oneself and implies an adequate development of the identity process, of knowing and appreciating oneself, of the feeling of safety and the sense of belonging, of the domain of certain social and familiar communication skills and of the feeling of being useful and valuable for the others.
"The self-esteem constitutes the core of the personality" (Rogers, 1994. p 11).
The self-esteem influences the self-regulation of the conduct, mediating in the decision-making process, influencing the choice of objectives and the establishment of plans of action" (Markus & Kunda, 1986, p. 11).
Self-esteem is the valuation that each person has of oneself, it is our own assessment or judgment of our way of being, our actions, our psychological and physical traits. All these characteristics determine our lives.
Factors that influence the self-esteem
The family’s influence
The external influences that we receive from a tender age are essential for building a proper self-esteem. Data show that in domestic violence situations both victim and aggressor had low self-esteem.
There are families, teachers, and other agents who despise, humiliate, mock the child when he/she asks for help, feels sick or is afraid, etc. These actions are offset by other opposite like make the child feel loved, intelligent, good, which cause the child to be greatly confused, which negatively influences in the child’s development.
People who receive this type of education, when they become adults, shall transmit this same message to people that are more vulnerable both physically and psychologically. The most widespread violence is the emotional one, children who suffer this type of intimidation often feel frustrated, suffering in silence keeping it to themselves.
It is for this reason that families unconsciously damage the self-esteem of the individual. The problem lies in those who were educated in this way and follow the same pattern.
Communication’s influence
Communication has a strong relationship with self-esteem, depending on how it is said, the information will have a positive or negative effect. Imposing an idea to others in order to achieve something, dominating a situation or people is the most common behavior in violent people which have a serious communication problem.
Society’s influence
La sociedad en la que vivimos tiene un papel muy importante en la formación de las personas, ya que a partir de la cultura, las familias adoptan diferentes formas para trasmitirla a sus miembros e influyen en la personalidad, de acuerdo con unos modelos sociales. La imagen se construye de fuera hacia dentro, desde lo que piensan de nosotros los que nos rodean. Esto provoca que personas que tienen una alta posición social tenga una baja autoestima. Los estándares en que se basan las personas para evaluarse así mismas son culturales y están establecidos por modelos sociales que determinan nuestra imagen hacia los demás.
Influencia de la escuela
It is essential that teachers know which values they want to pass on to their students and if they are able to transmit them.
In the process of self-awareness, the teacher can benefit or affect the students. Therefore, it is essential that our students feel good in their own skins.
The academic failure contributes to undermining self-esteem. Teachers should know what is the development stage of each one of their students as to adapt to them and contribute to their academic and professional training.
It has to be kept in mind that each student has a three-dimensional picture:
It is therefore essential that the time students are in school they learn who they want to be according to their characteristics.
To be a good teacher, the following needs to be taken into account:
The role of the teacher in the self-esteem
It is key to implement the emotional education from a tender age.
At present, teachers are not only mere information transmitters, but they also have a role in emotional education.
The child's feelings toward oneself will influence the personal learning. The non-solved children’s personal problems will consequently negatively affect their learning
The teacher becomes a key reference throughout the school life of the child. And the teacher does so by giving the students a learning environment adapted to their capabilities. Therefore, it is essential that parents have a close relationship with the teacher about the child's educational process, establishing some guidelines for joint action.
The expectations of the teacher about the students are essential to the strengthening of the student's self-esteem. Any teacher who does not trust the student will hardly provide the student with opportunities to demonstrate the personal skills, which will make that the child continues to be a bad student. Otherwise, the student who is trusted and motivated will experience a full development.
Hence the importance of knowing the faculty and building a student’s positive image, making the student feel accepted.
The social learning are those that occur inside and outside the school, which bring respect for the person and the rest, helps them solve conflicts and get along better with others.
Teachers believe that children should accept themselves and others so that their knowledge is more useful and efficient, and when this is the case, they may face their own limitations and the knowledge they acquire will have greater value.
After several interviews with more than fifty teachers, it was concluded that as children respected themselves, they improved their skills and academic results, in relation with their gained confidence.
Rodríguez Espinar (1986, p.28) stated that in the teaching-learning processes with a high incidence of school performance, and that this is subject to change and modifiable, to some extent, by the educational action, we can understand the interest in the educational framework raises the issue and the attitudes of the teacher that help students achieve a positive self-concept and a high level of self-esteem.
The concept that develops the personal capacity, the appreciation on the personal qualities and attitudes is built basing on the own experiences and the interaction with others. In particular importance, what is significant for students is what their teachers are.
"Various research show that some teacher behaviors and attitudes have a favorable impact on the self-esteem of the students" (Machargo, 1991, p. 28).
Self-esteem is built when the teacher promotes the active participation, cooperation and a climate of trust in the classroom, in which the protagonist is the student, being able to express, and make mistakes without any fear.
Saura (1996) says that without the intention to be exhaustive, below are a series of attitudes and behaviors on the part of the teacher who, in our view, are particularly suitable to educate the self-esteem of students:
Teachers should be alert to discover the opportunities that make the student self-improvement within the group.
The teacher must guide the student toward maturity, ease that students make their own decisions in accordance with their needs and abilities.
In the present study, the objective is to determine if the various components of the academic, social, emotional, and physical self-concept are related to the academic performance and how these self-concepts and performance are related to other variables such as gender and age in sixth grade.
The study follows the descriptive method, performing a comparative analysis based on the data collected.
The overall objective is complemented with the specific objectives that are listed below.
Research’s objectives
Check the possible relationship or association degree among the various dimensions of the academic, social, emotional, familiar and physical self-concept and the gender variable in 6th grade in a public school in the province of Madrid.
Hypothesis:
In accordance with the set goals, the following hypothesis are found:
H1. The academic self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys.
H2. The social self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys.
H3. The emotional self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys.
H4. The familiar self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys.
H5. The physical self-concept in 6th grade is higher in boys than in girls.
Population and sample
The sample of the research was of 50 participants from a Public Preschool and Elementary Education School of Madrid, 28 boys and 22 girls, aged between 11 and 13. It is of vital importance to say that the sample includes 19 students who have retaken 6th grade, 17 boys and 2 girls.
Techniques and tools
In order to conduct the research, the Autoconcepto Forma 5 has been used (see Annex 1), whose authors are Garcia and Musitu (2001). This questionnaire measures five basic dimensions of self-concept in children and adolescents: the academic, social, emotional, and physical self-concepts. Each of the dimensions consists of 6 items. Individuals must answer using a scale of 1 to 99 points, where 1 means they completely disagree and 99 means they totally agree.
Below is a definition of the self-concept’s 5 dimensions:
Academic self-concept. It refers to the perception that the subject has about the quality of his performance, as a student or as a worker. It focuses on two aspects: the first relating to the feeling that is generated in the student or worker about the personal performance through the teacher or the boss (a good student, a good worker...), and the second relating to specific qualities that are especially valued in that context (intelligence, habit of work...).
Social self-concept. The perception that the individual has of his competence in the social relations. It includes two aspects: one referred to the subject’s social network and his ease or difficulty to maintain it or expand it; the other aspects is related to some important qualities in interpersonal relations (being friendly and cheerful).
Emotional self-concept. It is the understanding that the subject has of his emotional state and his responses to specific situations, with a certain degree of commitment and involvement in his daily life. It allows to differentiate between two aspects: the first refers to the general perception about one's own emotional state (I am easily frightened, I am nervous), and the second focused on the emotional self-evaluation in specific situations (when they ask me something or talk to me) in which the other person has higher rank (a teacher, a boss...).
Familiar self-concept. It is the perception of the subject of his engagement, participation and integration in the family environment. This dimension encompasses two aspects. The first of them is specifically linked to the trust and affection of the parents. The second is related to four variables of the family and the home.
Physical self-concept. It refers to the perception of the subject of his physical appearance and physical condition. This dimension includes two complementary aspects. One refers to practicing sports in the social, physical and skill components. Another one is related to the physical aspect.
Procedure
We went to the school to conduct the investigation, with the previous authorization of the management team. We conducted the F- 5 questionnaire to students of the two 6th grade classrooms, in the early hours of the morning.
Prior to its implementation, we made a brief explanation of how to rate the different sentences from 0 to 99 points, for this reason, we draw a thermometer on the blackboard so that they could have an idea of how to rate the sentences in the most adjusted way, there were several group examples to ensure that the tool was correctly answered individually.
Academic/working self-concept
In the first place, with regard to the results obtained once analyzed the labor dimension of academic self-concept, we stress that there are important differences in the group and gender (see Table 1 and 2 and Figure 1). As we can observe, the boys and girls of the sample group show parallel lines in their academic self-concept, which allows to analyze the sample as a whole and we find that the lowest percentile is 6.2 and 6.7 the highest percentile, being 6.45 the total sample average.
If we analyze the sample by gender, we can observe in the girls the lowest percentile is 6.3 and 6.7 the highest, being 6.55 the average. With respect to the boys, the lowest percentile is 6.2 while the highest is 6.5 with a 6.35 average.
Table 1.
Academic/Working self-concept percentile according to gender
Academic self-concept | Girls | Boys | Group |
6,7+ | 6,5+ | 6,7+ | |
6,3 - | 6,2 - | 6,2 - | |
6,55 average | 6,35 average | 6,45 average |
Note: own source
Table 2.
Academic/Working self-concept percentage according to gender
Academic self-concept | Girls | Boys |
+50% | 74% | 66% |
-50% | 26% | 34% |
Total | 100% | 100% |
Note: own source
After the analysis of the sample group, jointly and by gender we can find differences between boys and girls. We can conclude that girls in the sample have a higher average in comparison with boys in the academic/working self-concept, additionally, in this group there is a considerable difference as there is a large group of grade repeaters (17 boys and 2 girls).
Social self-concept
With regard to the analysis of the sample group corresponding to the social self-concept, differences in the group and gender can be observed (see Table 3 and 4 and Figure 2). As we can observe, the boys and girls of the sample group do not follow parallel lines in their social self-concept, which allows to analyze the sample as a whole. We find that the lowest percentile is 7.0 and 7.26 the highest, being 7.13 the total sample average.
If we analyze the sample by gender, we can observe that in the girls, the lowest percentile is 7.1 and the highest is 7.22, which results in a 7.16 average. Regarding boys, the lowest percentile is 7.0 while the highest is 7.26 with a 7.13 average.
Table 3.
Social self-concept percentile according to gender
Social self-concept: | Girls | Boys | Groups |
7,22+ | 7,26+ | 7,26+ | |
7,1- | 7,0- | 7,0- | |
7,16 average | 7,13 average | 7,13 average |
Note: own source
Table 4.
Social self-concept percentage according to the gender
Social self-concept | Girls | Boys |
+50% | 89% | 83% |
-50% | 11% | 17% |
Total | 100% | 100% |
Note: own source
Once the analysis of our sample is made jointly and by gender, we can see that there are no significant differences between boys and girls. We can conclude that for both girls and boys their social component is similar and constant and there is no relevant differences.
Emotional self concept
With regard to the analysis of the sample group corresponding to the emotional self-concept, differences in the group and gender can be observed (see Table 3.0, 3.1 and Figure 3). As we can observe, the profiles of the boys and girls of the group are not parallel in their emotional self-concept, which allows to analyze the sample as a whole and we find that the lowest percentile is 4.75 and 5.74 the highest percentile, being 5.24 the total sample average.
If we analyze the sample by gender, we can observe that in the girls, the lowest percentile is 4.65 and the highest is 5.46, which results in a 5.05 average. Regarding boys, the lowest percentile is 4.97 while the highest is 5.74, being 5.35 the average in boys.
Table 5.
Emotional self-concept percentile according to gender
Emotional self-concept | Girls | Boys | Group |
5,46+ | 5,74+ | 5,74+ | |
4.65- | 4.97- | 4.75- | |
5,05 average | 5,35 average | 5,24 average |
Note: own source
Table 6.
Emotional self-concept percentage according to the gender
Emotional self-concept | Girls | Boys |
+50% | 79% | 82% |
-50% | 21% | 18% |
Total | 100% | 100% |
Note: own source
After the analysis of the sample group, jointly and by gender we can find significant differences between boys and girls. We can conclude that the boys in the sample have a higher average than girls regarding the emotional self-concept.
Familiar self-concept
With regard to the analysis of the sample group corresponding to the familiar self-concept, there are no significant differences in the group and gender (see Table 4.0, 4.1 and Figure 4). As we can see, the results of boys and girls are parallel regarding their familiar self-concept.
If we look at the sample jointly, we note that the lowest percentile is 7.88 while the top percentile is 8.22, being 8.05 the average. If we analyze the sample by gender, we can observe that in the girls, the lowest percentile is 7.88 and the highest is 8.22, which results in a 8.05 average. On the contrary, for the boys, the lowest percentile is 7.90 while the highest is 8.21 with a 8.05 average.
Table 7.
Familiar self-concept percentile according to gender
Familiar self-concept | Girls | Boys | Group |
8,22+ | 8,21+ | 8,22+ | |
7,88- | 7,90- | 7,88- | |
8,05 average | 8,05 average | 8,05 average |
Note: own source
Table 8.
Familiar self-concept percentage according to the gender
Familiar serl-concept | Girls | Boys |
+50% | 93% | 92% |
-50% | 7% | 8% |
Total | 100% | 100% |
Note: own source
After the analysis of the data, we can see that there are no major differences between the two genders, in both the result is similar and continuous.
Fisical self-concept
Finally, regarding the physical self-concept, we can observe large differences between the two genders (see Table 5.0 and 5.1 and Figure 5). As we can see, the results between boys and girls about their physical selves are revealing.
By observing the sample in a comprehensive manner, we note that the lowest percentile is 5.98 while the top percentile is 6.20, with a 6.09 average. In terms of gender analysis, we can see that the lowest percentile in girls is 5.98 while the highest is 6.12 with a 6.05 average, with respect to the boys, the lowest percentile is 5.99 while the highest is 6.20 with a 6.09 average.
Table 9.
Physical self-concept percentile according to gender
Fisical self-concept | Girls | Boys | Group |
6,12+ | 6,20+ | 5,98+ | |
5,98- | 5,99- | 6,20- | |
6,05 average | 6,09 average | 6,09 average |
Note: own source
Table 10.
Physical self-concept percentage according to the gender
Fisical self-concept | Girls | Boys |
+50% | 82% | 87% |
-50% | 18% | 13% |
Total | 100% | 100% |
Note: own source
Once the analysis is made, we can conclude that there are large differences between the two genders, that is, a greater physical self-concept can be appreciated in the boys group in comparison with the girls group.
After analyzing the data related to self-concept’s five aspects (Academic/Working, Social, Emotional, and Physical) using the Autoconcepto AF-5 questionnaire and focusing on the academic aspect, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The personality of the individual also affects the self-esteem, if it is an individual with an outgoing personality, although that person has a low academic performance, he will not deem so as a negative aspect, but as an aspect that should be improved from a positive vision.
On the other hand, if a student is more introverted and shy, the student can think of the personal academic performance as a negative aspect so this can adversely influence the student’s self-esteem.
For this reason, the teacher plays a fundamental role in the self-esteem of their students, it is essential to educate the self-esteem of people from a tender age, so the school plays a major role in this area.
When a student has a high self-esteem, the student is motivated and has no fear of failure, the student learns best and optimistically faces the everyday challenges.
Many teachers have demonstrated with their experiences that conflict of feelings prevented the learning and so have shown how, when this issue is resolved, the students sensibly increased learning.
When a conflict is resolved, children have a better acceptance of themselves and of others, but this does not indicate that all the difficulties have been resolved.
For this reason, the teacher must find the strategies needed to create a respectful climate in the classroom, a climate in which everyone feels supported, and to do so as to be able to get to know the students and feel valued and respected by the group regardless of the grades and that such academic qualifications influence the person’s global view.
Teachers have a major responsibility to help children to accept themselves as well as others. Nevertheless, the teacher should not do this work alone, but with resources such as the children themselves, their parents and qualified staff.
Once the study was finished, the following conclusions were drawn:
H1. The academic self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys. That is confirmed, this result coincides with the one carried out by Gorostegui, E. & Dorr, A.
H2. The social self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys. That result is confirmed.
H3. The physical self-concept in 6th grade is higher in boys than in girls. That result is confirmed, it coincides with the one carried out by Amezcua, J & Pichardo, M.
H4. The familiar self-concept in 6th grade is higher in girls than in boys. That result is confirmed, it coincides with the one carried out by Amezcua, J & Pichardo, M.
H5. The physical self-concept in 6th grade is higher in boys than in girls. That result is confirmed, it coincides with the one carried out by Amezcua, J & Pichardo, M.
Finally, there will be the last section with the conclusions of the article and, subsequently, the main conclusions. Constraints and continuity proposals will be also included.
Alcántara, J.A. (1993): Cómo educar la autoestima. Madrid: CEAC.
Amezcua, J y Pichardo, M. (2000). Diferencias de género en autoconcepto en sujetos adolescentes. Anales de psicología, 16(2), 207-214
Auger, L. (1987): Ayudarse a sí mismo. Santander: Sal Terrae.
Auger, L. (1992): Ayudarse a sí mismo aún más. Santander: Sal Terrae.
Bonet, J.V. (1997). Sé amigo de ti mismo. Manual de autoestima. Santander: Sal Terrae.
Branden, N. (1991): Cómo mejorar su autoestima. Barcelona: Paidós.
Brunet, J.J. y Negro, J.L. (1989): Tutoría con adolescentes. Madrid: S. Pío X.
Brunet, J.J. y Negro, J.L. (1994): ¿Cómo organizar una Escuela de Padres? Madrid: Pío X.
Clemens, H. (1991): Cómo desarrollar la autoestima en niños y adolescentes. Madrid: Debate.
Feldman, J.R. (2000). Autoestima ¿Cómo desarrollarla? Juegos, actividades, recursos, experiencias creativas. Madrid: Narcea.
Fromm, E. (1981): El miedo a la libertad. Buenos aires: Paidós.
Fromm, E. (1984): El arte de amar. Buenos aires: Paidós.
García, N.; Cermeño, F. y Fernández, M.T. (1991). La tutoría en las Enseñanzas Medias. Madrid: Publicaciones ICCE.
García, F. y Musito, G. (1995): AF5 Autoconcepto forma 5. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Gil Martínez, R. (1997). Manual para tutorías y departamentos de orientación. Madrid: Escuela Española.
Gillham, H.L. (1982). Cómo ayudar a los niños a aceptarse a sí mismos y a aceptar a los demás. Barcelona: Paidós educador.
Gómez, P. (2002). Estrategias didácticas para trabajar las habilidades sociales en el contexto escolar. Recuperado de: http://convivencia.educa.
Gorostegui, E. y Dorr, A. (2005). Género y Autoconcepto: Un Análisis Comparativo de las Diferencias por Sexo en una Muestra de Niños de Educación General Básica (EGB) (1992-2003). Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.
Hay, L.L. (1996): El poder está dentro de ti. Barcelona: Urano.
Hernández, P y García, Mª D (1992): PIELE. Programa Instruccional para la Evaluación y Liberación Emocional “Aprendiendo a vivir”.
Lacasse, M. (1994): Tengo una cita conmigo. Santander: Sal Terrae.
Lázaro, R. y otros (1981): Identidad personal. Madrid: CENIEC.
Machargo, J. (1991): El profesor y el autoconcepto de sus alumnos. Madrid: ESCUELA ESPAÑOLA.
Markus, H. y Kunda, Z. (1986): “Stability and malleabillity of the self- concept”. Journal of Social Psichology, 51.
Marsh, H, W, y Shavelson, R. (1985): “Self- concept. Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure”. Educational Psicologist, 20.
Martín Mateo, A. (1989): Puedo ser otro y feliz. Madrid: Sociedad de Educación Atenas.
Martín Mateo, A. (1992): El hombre en busca de la felicidad. Madrid: Sociedad de Educación Atenas.
Maslow, A. H. (1994): La personalidad creadora. Barcelona: Kairós.
McKay, J. (1991): Fomento de la autoestima en los niños. En Mckay, M. Y Fanning, P.: Autoestima. Evolución y mejora. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
Navarro Suanes, M. (2009). Autoconocimiento y autoestima. Recuperado de: http://www2.fe.ccoo.es/
Palmer, P. y Alberti, M. (1992): Autoestima. Valencia: Promolibro-Cinteco. Valencia.
Pieczenik, S. (1991): Vivo bien, ¿por qué me siento mal? Barcelona: Grijalbo.
Rigón E. (2002). Cómo desarrollar la autoestima en los niños. Bilbao: Mensajero.
Rodríguez Espinar, S. (1986): “Factores que influyen en el rendimiento escolar”. Apuntes de Educación.
Rogers, C. (1971): Psicoterapia y relaciones humanas. Madrid: Alfaguara.
Rogers, C. (1986): El camino del ser. Barcelona: Kairós.
Rogers, C. (1994): El proceso de convertirse en persona. Paidós. Barcelona. (9ª reimpresión).
Rosenthal, R. y Jacobson, L. (1980). Pigmalión en la escuela. Madrid: Marova.
Ruiz, S. (1994). Crecer como persona. Madrid: S. Pablo.
Saura, P. (1996). Cómo educar el autoconcepto. Propuesta pedagógica. Servicio de publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia.
Tierno, B. y Giménez, M. (2004). La educación y la enseñanza de 6 a 8 años: !Juega conmigo! Madrid: Aguilar.
Tierno, B. y Giménez, M. (2004). La educación y el desarrollo escolar del preadolescente de 10 a 12 años: ¡Ya no soy un niño!. Madrid: Aguilar.