ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES & PRACTICEShttp://mlsjournals.com/Environmental-Science-Practices |
|
(2024) Environmental Sciences & Practices, 2(2), 67-91.
OBTAINING FLOUR FROM COFFEE WASTE FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION
Farah Silvana Marta Alabí Hernández
International Iberoamerican University (El Salvador)
farah.alabi@doctorado.unini.edu.mx · https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-3555
José Del Carmen Zavala Loría
European Atlantic University (Spain)
jose.zavala@uneatlantico.es · https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-1262
Abstract: The drying of the coffee fruit is carried out as one of the previous activities to obtain the coffee bean, which is later used in different drinks. In this study, two alternative drying processes have been applied, and it has been evaluated if the amount of by-product obtained is significantly affected in order to elaborate a flour. The methodology consisted in obtaining the material that surrounds the coffee seed and drying through two different drying processes, which were: 1) Obtaining the pulp, with a manual pulper and then drying it in the sun and 2) Coffee dried directly by the sun and then pass it through a thresher. Each experiment consisted of pulping 14 print runs of 115 pounds each; (leaving out 140 pounds of coffee that were delivered, but not taken into account in the statistical analysis, due to the difficulty of going down to the farms and taking measurements (statistically missing values); the data was recorded and tabulated to perform a t test comparison between independent samples. The research found that there is a statistical difference between the two drying processes since 2.66 pounds more are obtained than the process in which the coffee is first dried and then the pulp is obtained by threshing.
keywords: Pulp, manual pulping, threshing, flour.
OBTENCIÓN DE HARINA A PARTIR DE DESECHOS DE CAFÉ PARA CONSUMO HUMANO
Resumen: El secado del fruto del cafeto se realiza como una de las actividades previas para obtener el grano de café que luego se utiliza en diferentes preparaciones. En este trabajo se han utilizado dos procesos alternativos de secado, y evaluado si la cantidad de subproducto obtenida se ve significativamente afectada para luego elaborar una harina. La metodología utilizada consistió en obtener el material que envuelve a la semilla del café y hacer el secado utilizando dos procesos de secado los cuales fueron: 1) Obtención de la pulpa, con una despulpadora manual para luego secarla al sol y 2) Café secado al sol para luego pasarla por una trilladora. Cada experimento consistió en el despulpado de 14 tirajes de 115 libras cada uno; (dejando por fuera 140 libras de café que fueron entregados, pero no tomados en cuenta en el análisis estadístico, por dificultad de bajar a las fincas y tomar mediciones (valores perdidos estadísticamente) los datos fueron registrados y tabulados para realizar una prueba t de comparación entre muestras independientes. La investigación encontró que existe diferencia estadística entre los dos procesos de secado ya que se obtienen 2.66 libras más que el proceso en que primero se seca el café y luego se obtiene la pulpa por trillado.
Palabras clave: Pulpa, despulpado manual, trillado, harina, secado.
Introduction
It includes the presentation of the paper and the analysis of the literature on the subject, with special emphasis on previous research that justifies the study and that will then be contrasted in the discussion of the results.
All text is in 12-point Cambria font, single-spaced and with no spacing between paragraphs.
The present investigation attempts to compare the impact that two different drying methods have on the amount of pulp obtained after its separation from the coffee bean.
The yield of this process is important when considering the pulp, not as a disposable by-product, but as an input to extend the coffee production chain. In this case, by becoming raw material for the production of a flour suitable for human consumption.
Academic research and initiatives aimed at taking advantage of the by-product in question have been varied in the recent past; since, as has been demonstrated, achieving its objective implies reducing harmful impacts on ecosystems and generating income for economic actors who potentially perceive this activity as a source of profits.
The coffee bush is a shrub whose seed is ground and roasted to obtain a powder that serves as the base for the popular beverage known as coffee. Both the cultivation, harvesting and processing involved in the production chain have become a central activity for many companies and families, to the point that the economy of several countries is influenced by the commercial transactions that revolve around coffee. In view of the above, it is necessary to identify opportunities for improvement in all processing activities (Pérez et al., 2022), and to try to extend the production chain in order to minimize losses and waste.
There are several characteristics to take into account in the cultivation of coffee
Depending on the altitude at which it is grown, it can be classified as follows
There are coffee plantations exposed directly to the sun that develop fruits with low weight and, therefore, low relative yields in comparison to those obtained in plantations under the shade of other trees that protect the coffee plants from the elements manifested in direct solar radiation, strong winds, copious rainfall, and high temperatures. On the other hand, producing under shade improves the landscape and biodiversity characteristic of complementary crops, among others:
Coffee fruit is classified as non-climacteric, as it does not ripen after being harvested (Martínez et al., 2017)
Once harvested, it is dried, roasted and ground to produce coffee powder.
As regards drying, two alternative processes are generally applied: one using mechanical dryers and the other using solar heat. The artisanal method consists of spreading the grain to be exposed to the sun using soil, cement patios, or plastic film (Medina et al., 2016)
After drying, as mentioned above, the grain is roasted and milled, a process that, once completed, yields an average of 60% of the grain. The 40% surplus is constituted by pulp: organic waste that being understood as a by-product is generally not taken advantage of, and whose management entails environmental impacts (Serna et al., 2018).
The environmental impact of coffee pulping is negative if it is not carried out responsibly. Their careless disposal could affect the edaphic microflora, where acidophilic fungi are the main metabolizers of organic matter (Cervantes et al., 2023).
However, a counterproposal to the simple action of discarding the pulp is to take advantage of its properties to expand the value chain by industrializing it as a raw material for various agroindustrial products. The pulp contains about 86% water, 43.58% of the dry fruit weight, 1.3% caffeine and is rich in carbohydrates, proteins, pectins, bioactive compounds such as polyphenols (Torres et al., 2019).
Various background information on how to use pulp and reduce waste can be found. In 2013, research was conducted on processes for obtaining honey and flour from coffee pulp (Ramírez & Jaramillo, 2013). The researchers set out to take advantage of coffee co-products in the development of raw materials that can be incorporated into the development of other products containing polyphenols, vitamins, proteins, and minerals suitable for human or animal consumption and that can be incorporated into medicines, cosmetics, and ethanol, among others. This was achieved by concentrating and conserving the mucilage to produce honey, and from the pulp they manufactured coffee pulp flour.
This last effort coincides with this research, as it aims to reduce environmental pollution (Ramírez Vélez, 2013) by reducing industrial waste, expanding the boundaries of the production process, and making the most of the coffee plant product whose pulp has bioactive compounds with functional characteristics, which allows its use as a raw material. (Serna et al., 2018)
In this sense, it is intended that the by-products of the coffee process are taken advantage of and can contribute to various social and economic sectors, to the national economy, to the generation of employment, and to the development of new products that contribute to consolidate food security.
Among the products that can be developed is a pulp flour, which is the proposal of this work, and which finds as preceding activities the comparison of two drying-pulping methods.
Drying is a process by which the coffee bean is dehydrated to prevent deterioration and thus preserve its quality during storage (Zactiti et al., 2004; Ventura-Cruz et al., 2019).
During 2019, research was conducted on the Effectiveness of a Coffee Drying Process using solar dryers with continuous air flow system and driven by photovoltaic energy (Prada et al., 2019); this in order to reduce drying time to obtain an average of 12% humidity. What was interesting about this research was that grain moisture was gradually reduced over five days and the usefulness of solar dryers was demonstrated (Prada et al., 2019).
With this background, the methodology used here is developed, followed by an analysis of the drying-pulping processes and their outstanding results.
Method
This study was carried out in collaboration with two farms located in the department of La Libertad, El Salvador, where the two drying processes were carried out independently and then compared to determine which one provided the best pulp yield.
Encuentro de los Cumpas Farm
The farm is located in the municipality of Jayaque, department of La Libertad, at 998 meters above sea level. Where a manual pulper "IDEAL ANTIOQUEÑA" is used to separate the husk of the coffee grapes (pulp) and extract the almonds that are used for the traditional beverage. This equipment is supplied with coffee grapes and water through a hopper, and by manually turning the handle, pressure is exerted that suctions the grain and separates the kernel from the by-product as the inputs pass through the gear. For this research, the by-product (pulp) was collected in sacks and handled to ensure its safety, since it is later used as raw material for a flour suitable for human consumption. The following flow chart is derived from the applied process (Figure 1)
Figure 1
Diagram of the wet pulping process. It is
used to separate or remove the
shell from the coffee fruit and extract the kernel
The above figure coincides with the sequence shown below:
A total of 1750 pounds of coffee grapes were received, separating it into 15
observations, of which 14 of
115 pounds each were taken, leaving out a lot of 140 pounds;
With the wet pulping machine, the
grape coffee was processed to separate the bean from its coating.
The pulp is dried in the sun with constant turning for 15 days, generating
the dried by-product;
This
pulp was transported for medium dark roasting;
Passage through industrial mill;
Flour production.
Figure 2 shows each of the stages of the process, from the cutting of the coffee until the flour is obtained.
Figure 2
From the cutting of the coffee plant and the
use of a mechanical pulper
to the production of coffee pulp flour
ELABORATION OF FLOUR FROM COFFEE PULP BY-PRODUCT AT EL ENCUENTRO DE LOS CUMPAS JAYAQUE FARM | |
---|---|
COFFEE SHORT |
In El Salvador, this operation begins in October and usually lasts until May and June of the following year. At the Encuentro de los Cumpas farm, the maturity of the coffee fruit is determined by the changes in color from green to yellow to crimson red, and by a change in the consistency of the pulp from hard to soft. At this last stage, the fruit is cut by hand by knowledgeable people who visually determine the right point to remove the fruit from the bush. |
OBTAINING GRAPE COFFEE |
Grape coffee is understood to be the fruit cut from the coffee bush during harvesting on the farm. The fruits are harvested in containers, and then transferred to sacks to facilitate transport and handling. On the farm, the coffee that is harvested is pulped the same day, as they consider that careless piling accelerates fermentation processes that would damage the fruit. |
MECHANICAL PULPING |
Pulping is carried out by means of a machine that separates the coffee bean (product) from the pulp (by-product); the latter being the input for this research. This operation consists of extracting the pulp or epicarp from the grain with a machine called a pulper, as described below: Washing and immersing the grains in water to remove the grains that have little weight (immaturity or damage index). The grains are fed into the machine, which sucks the grains by means of rollers that will exert mechanical pressure as the pulper cylinder is manually rotated. Water is added to the hopper, which, by soaking the contents, contributes to the conduction of pulp and coffee. Finally, whole coffee beans are obtained separated from the pulp. The latter is used as an input in this research, as opposed to the disposable by-product treatment it is generally given. |
SUN DRYING OF WET PULP |
For the development of this research, we proceeded as follows: Washing of the pulp, for which a 200 ppm chlorine solution is prepared, obtained from a commercial chlorine at a concentration of 6%, diluting 5 ml per gallon of water. Rinsing the pulp to remove any residual chlorine Drained to dry it for the necessary time to lose humidity and taking advantage of the sun as a natural resource. The parameter that is observed is the color change, which goes from crimson red on day one, and changing to brown (coffee) on day 21. After a few days, a manual test is carried out to check if the pulp pulverizes easily. |
STOVE ROASTING |
Oven roasting is a unitary operation that serves: To finish extracting moisture until a medium dark roast is achieved, which are the characteristics desired for the pulp. To eliminate biological risks by destroying microorganisms, complying with the time-temperature binomial where baking exceeds 70º C where pathogens are destroyed, being maintained at 250º C for 2 hours. |
Ground |
Unit operation used to reduce the size of the dry pulp until it is pulverized. This is a fine milling process to obtain flour characterized by its easy mixing with any other type of edible sifted material to make cookies, bread, pasta, among others. |
Flour production |
Powder resulting from the grinding of dry pulp that can be used for human and/or animal consumption |
La Sierra de León Farm
Finca La Sierra de León is located in the municipality of Huizúcar, department of La Libertad, at 640 meters above sea level in El Salvador. In this environment, the drying of the coffee grapes in patios was experimented in order to later be threshed. The process followed the sequence described below:
-1750 pounds of coffee grapes were received, separating it into 15 observations, of which 14 of 115 pounds were taken, leaving out 140 pounds (lost value);
-The grape coffee was dried, for 21 days, directly in the sun until it was transformed into cherry coffee;
-After 21 days, the coffee beans were threshed to separate them from the pulp (by-product) using a threshing machine.
-The pulp obtained by threshing was collected immediately and carefully deposited in clean sacks. Since it is the input for the process being considered, it was handled as raw material: keeping it safe so that the flour does not involve any physical, chemical or biological risk.
-The bags were transported to the roasting station where the pulp was exposed to heat until a medium dark finish was achieved, which, in addition to facilitating the grinding stage, maintains the caffeine with greater sweetness than a completely dark roast. Temperature is used as a contributor to safety.
-The roasted pulp was passed through an industrial mill to obtain flour.
Figure 3 shows the flow diagram for pulping by threshing machine.
Figure 3
Flow chart for pulping with threshing
machine
In order to facilitate the understanding of the process, Figure 4 is included; in which each of the stages of the process from the cutting of the coffee to the obtaining of the flour are observed.
Figure 4
Processing of flour by-product of coffee
drying using a threshing
machine
PREPARATION OF FLOUR FROM COFFEE PULP BY-PRODUCT AT THE SIERRA DE LEÓN FARM LOCATED IN HUIZÚCAR | |
---|---|
COFFEE SHORT |
The coffee is harvested manually, selecting the ripe fruit and leaving the rest for 15
to 30 days;
|
COFFEE DRYING TO CHERRY |
In this method the drying is done directly on the cement; the grain is spread in layers
whose thickness is calculated between 3.50 and 3.55 centimeters, stirring constantly
from 3 to 5 times per day.
During the night or periods when there is no sun, the deployment is covered with plastic
sheeting.
Drying lasts from 10 to 21 days, and 3 aspects are taken into account for testing:
|
THRESHOLDING |
Threshing is the operation in which, after drying, the grain is separated from the dry pulp known as husk. The final objective of the process is to obtain the grain. This research extends its purpose to processing the by-product (pulp) obtained from threshing. |
SUBPRODUCT |
The by-product is treated as agricultural waste; despite being rich in bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, alkaloids, proteins, chlorogenic acids, dietary fiber, carbohydrates, and antioxidants. |
STOVE ROASTING |
Stove roasting is carried out until the application of heat allows the pulp to reach a dark brown color. The desired finish was achieved in the oven at a temperature of 250º C, for a period of 2 hours. |
Ground |
The grinding operation was carried out in an industrial electric mill. Finally, it was possible to obtain a flour suitable for human consumption and usable in combination with another food sift. |
The flours obtained from the two processes discussed above were exposed to moisture tests on a dry basis in triplicate, using the moisture analyzer programmed with standard drying profile at a temperature of 120°C and in the automatic drying determination mode (mass change per 1 mg/d for 60 s).
The intervening factors were the raw materials and the appropriate equipment to measure humidity; according to detail:
Procedure
|
The samples of the different stages of the processes used were arranged in triplicate; they were stored at room temperature in plastic bags to be transported to the point where they would be analyzed. |
|
The moisture content of the samples was determined in triplicate using the RADWAG Analyzer. The equipment was programmed with standard drying profile at 120º C and in automatic determination mode. Subsequently, the data were recorded in order to obtain their averages. |
Results
The database generated for the two experiments to collect data were as follows: Table 1 shows a consolidated summary of the results obtained considering the two drying methods.
Table 3
Comparison between the two drying methods used
Place of coffee production | Meeting of the Cumpas | The Sierra de León |
Pounds of initial coffee | 1610 lbs | 1610 lbs |
Meters above sea level at which the coffee was harvested. | 998 meters above sea level. | 640 m.a.s.l. |
Pulping method | With machine after cutting | Separated after drying and threshing |
Obtaining by-product (pounds of pulp) | 685 lbs. wet pulp obtained with pulper | 310 pounds of threshing |
Dry pounds | 350 lbs | 310 lbs |
% dry by-product | 20% | 17.71% |
Oven-roasted by-product | 260 lbs | 220 lbs |
Flour production | 150 lbs | 110 lbs |
Each of the raw materials in the different activities of the process were characterized according to the milestone to which they correspond, in order to justify drying as a method of conservation and stabilization, since the pulp, being dry, avoids the proliferation of microorganisms, molds and yeasts that would be present in an aqueous environment. The humidity results are presented below.
Humidity results of the jayaque experiment "finca el encuentro de los cumpas"
UVA COFFEE | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 5,644 | g | 5,347 | g | 5,936 | g | 5,642333333 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 1,765 | g | 1,983 | g | 2,011 | g | 1,919666667 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 2:18:40 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:01:33 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:22:48 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:14:20 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 68,728 | % | 62,913 | % | 66,121 | % | 65,92066667 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 219,773 | % | 169,64 | % | 195,176 | % | 194,863 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
WET LUNG | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 5,904 | g | 5,001 | g | 2,604 | g | 4,503 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 1,203 | g | 1,064 | g | 0,605 | g | 0,9573333333 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 1:03:36 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:57:49 a.m. | h:min:sec | 1:06:03 a.m. | h:min:sec | 1:02:29 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 79,624 | % | 78,724 | % | 76,766 | % | 78,37133333 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 390,773 | % | 370,019 | % | 330,413 | % | 363,735 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
BY-PRODUCT (PULP DRIED 12 DAYS) WITHOUT STOKER | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 2,583 | g | 2,887 | g | 2,618 | g | 2,696 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 2,409 | g | 2,682 | g | 2,441 | g | 2,510666667 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:21:25 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:22:05 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:20 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:37 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 6,664 | % | 7,101 | % | 6,761 | % | 6,842 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 7,139 | % | 7,643 | % | 7,251 | % | 7,344333333 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
MEDIUM DARK ROASTED BY-PRODUCT | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 2,195 | g | 2,217 | g | 2,597 | g | 2,336333333 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 2,169 | g | 2,186 | g | 2,562 | g | 2,305666667 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:04:03 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:04:50 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:05:10 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:04:41 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 1,185 | % | 1,354 | % | 1,31 | % | 1,283 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 1,198 | % | 1,372 | % | 1,327 | % | 1,299 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
BY-PRODUCT MEAL | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 5,073 | g | 5,061 | g | 5,194 | G | 5,109333333 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 4,777 | g | 4,720 | g | 4,868 | G | 4,788333333 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:20:56 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:19:54 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:03 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:20:38 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 5,835 | % | 6,737 | % | 6,276 | % | 6,282666667 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 6,196 | % | 7,224 | % | 6,697 | % | 6,705666667 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
Humidity results of the huizucar experiment "finca de léon"
UVA COFFEE | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 6,310 | g | 6,300 | g | 6,109 | g | 6,239666667 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 2,116 | g | 1,802 | g | 2,019 | g | 1,979 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 2:18:23 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:20:16 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:19:54 a.m. | h:min:sec | 2:19:31 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 66,466 | % | 71,396 | % | 66,950 | % | 68,27066667 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 198,204 | % | 249,611 | % | 202,575 | % | 216,7966667 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
CHERRY COFFEE 10 DAYS | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 4,739 | g | 5,587 | g | 4,741 | g | 5,022333333 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 4,477 | g | 5,325 | g | 4,479 | g | 4,760333333 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:59:05 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:57:56 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:59:03 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:58:41 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 5,509 | % | 4,689 | % | 5,526 | % | 5,241333333 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 5,829 | % | 4,920 | % | 5,849 | % | 5,532666667 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
BY-PRODUCT (THRESHED PULP) (WITHOUT STOVE) | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 3,018 | g | 3,045 | g | 2,875 | g | 2,979333333 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 2,682 | g | 2,712 | g | 2,562 | g | 2,652 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:23:15 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:50 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:00 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:22:02 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 11,104 | % | 10,848 | % | 10,887 | % | 10,94633333 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 12,490 | % | 12,168 | % | 12,217 | % | 12,29166667 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
MEDIUM DARK ROASTED BY-PRODUCT | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 2,858 | g | 3,096 | g | 3,090 | g | 3,014666667 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 2,799 | g | 3,030 | g | 3,025 | g | 2,951333333 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:07:25 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:08:30 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:08:15 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:08:03 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 1,996 | % | 2,132 | % | 2,072 | % | 2,066666667 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 2,036 | % | 2,178 | % | 2,115 | % | 2,109666667 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
BY-PRODUCT MEAL | AVERAGE | |||||||
M1 | M2 | M3 | UNIT | |||||
INITIAL WEIGHT | 5,219 | g | 5,061 | g | 5,071 | g | 5,117 | g |
FINAL WEIGHT | 4,874 | g | 4,718 | g | 4,733 | g | 4,775 | g |
TOTAL TIME | 12:25:10 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:19:50 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:19:25 a.m. | h:min:sec | 12:21:28 a.m. | h:min:sec |
% HUMIDITY WET BASIS | 6,646 | % | 6,740 | % | 6,647 | % | 6,677666667 | % |
% HUMIDITY DRY BASIS | 7,119 | % | 7,227 | % | 7,120 | % | 7,155333333 | % |
ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C | 120 | °C |
After studying moisture throughout the process, the quantitative yields in pounds of the two alternative methods were examined. The data were recorded and tabulated in the SPSS® statistical program, version 22, and then a t-test was performed to compare means between independent samples.
Table 1
Experiment 1. Jayaque manual pulper and pulp
dryer treatment
ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS | REMARK 1 | REMARK 2 | REMARK 3 | REMARK 4 | REMARK 5 | REMARK 6 | REMARK 7 | REMARK 8 | REMARK 9 | REMARK 10 | REMARK 11 | REMARK 12 | REMARK 13 | REMARK 14 | REMARK 15 | TOTAL POUNDS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVA COFFEE | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 140 | 1750 |
WET PULP BY-PRODUCT | 44,960 | 45,120 | 45,080 | 44,910 | 45,230 | 45,370 | 45,140 | 45,260 | 45,030 | 45,100 | 44,940 | 45,210 | 45,060 | 45,030 | 53,560 | 685,000 |
BY-PRODUCT SUN-DRIED PULP WITHOUT AN OVEN | 22,972 | 23,054 | 23,034 | 22,947 | 23,110 | 23,182 | 23,064 | 23,126 | 23,008 | 23,044 | 22,962 | 23,100 | 23,023 | 23,008 | 27,366 | 350,000 |
BY-PRODUCT KILN DRIED PULP | 17,065 | 17,126 | 17,111 | 17,046 | 17,168 | 17,221 | 17,133 | 17,179 | 17,092 | 17,118 | 17,058 | 17,160 | 17,103 | 17,092 | 20,329 | 260,000 |
FLOUR | 9,845 | 9,880 | 9,872 | 9,834 | 9,904 | 9,935 | 9,885 | 9,911 | 9,861 | 9,876 | 9,841 | 9,900 | 9,867 | 9,861 | 11,728 | 150,000 |
Table 2
Experiment 2. Sun-dried and threshed
to obtain pulp
ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS | REMARK 1 | REMARK 2 | REMARK 3 | REMARK 4 | REMARK 5 | REMARK 6 | REMARK 7 | REMARK 8 | REMARK 9 | REMARK 10 | REMARK 11 | REMARK 12 | REMARK 13 | REMARK 14 | REMARK 15 | TOTAL POUNDS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVA COFFEE | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 115 | 140 | 1750,000 |
CHERRY COFFEE (SUNNY IN PATIOS) | 42,810 | 42,620 | 42,760 | 42,670 | 42,800 | 42,820 | 42,730 | 42,670 | 42,690 | 42,650 | 42,710 | 42,790 | 42,680 | 42,770 | 51,830 | 650,000 |
BY-PRODUCT THRESHED PULP WITHOUT STALENESS | 20,417 | 20,326 | 20,393 | 20,350 | 20,412 | 20,422 | 20,379 | 20,350 | 20,360 | 20,341 | 20,369 | 20,408 | 20,355 | 20,398 | 24,719 | 310,000 |
BY-PRODUCT KILN DRIED PULP | 14,490 | 14,425 | 14,473 | 14,442 | 14,486 | 14,493 | 14,462 | 14,442 | 14,449 | 14,435 | 14,456 | 14,483 | 14,446 | 14,476 | 17,542 | 220,000 |
FLOUR | 7,245 | 7,213 | 7,236 | 7,221 | 7,243 | 7,246 | 7,231 | 7,221 | 7,224 | 7,218 | 7,228 | 7,241 | 7,223 | 7,238 | 8,771 | 110,000 |
Table 4
Group Statistics
TREATMENT
N
MEDIA
STANDARD DEVIATION
AVERAGE OF STANDARD ERROR
Pulping
Initial pulping (wet)
14
23.0453
.06684
.01786
Pulping at threshing (dry)
14
20.3772
.03117
.00833
The above table shows that, in pounds, a lower average by-product is obtained by the process in which the pulp is released dry during threshing. The standard deviations indicate that in both processes the observations tend to concentrate around the mean; that is, we have consistent performance in both pulping methods.
1. TEST OF EQUALITY OF VARIANTIES (Levene's test)
Levene's test is an integral part of the battery of results that SPSS produces when running a t-test for comparison of means. The purpose of the test is to determine whether the groups under study have equal variances. It is widely used because many statistical tests use the assumption that groups have equal variances. We start with the following hypothesis:
Ho: Variances of the 2 treatments are equal (σ21 =
σ22)
H1: The variances of the two treatments are different. Treatment 1 is more
variable than treatment 2 ( σ21 > σ22)
As the p-value of the test: p = 0.033 < α = 0.05 , it is observed that it falls in the Rejection zone, therefore the differences observed between the Variances are significant; therefore the null hypothesis of equality in the variances is rejected, since at the given significance level (α = 0.05) the variability of Treatment 1 is greater than that of Treatment 2.
2. TEST OF EQUALITY OF MEANS (Student's t-test)
Hypothesis Statement
Ho: The means of the 2 treatments are equal (μ1 =
μ2)
H1: Means of the two
treatments are different ( μ1 ≠ μ2)
The data was recorded and processed with SPSS software version 22, obtaining the following results:
INDEPENDENT SAMPLES TEST.
Levene's test for quality of variances | T-test for equality of means | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | Sig. | t | gl | Sig. (bilateral) | Difference from stockings | Standard error difference | 95% confidence interval of the difference | |||||
Inferior | Superior | |||||||||||
Dried Pulp | The following are assumed variances Equal | 5.067 | .033 | 135.35 | 26 | .000 | 2.66804 | 0.1971 | 2.62752 | 2.70855 | ||
Equal variances are not assumed | 135.35 | 18.398 | .000 | 2.66804 | 0.1971 | 2.62669 | 2.70938 |
The row corresponding to non-equal variances is taken: As the p-value of the test: p = 0.000 < α = 0.05 , falls in the rejection zone, it indicates that the differences observed between the means are significant; that is, there is statistical evidence at the significance level α = 0.05, that the mean μ1 = 23.0453 is greater than μ2 = 20.3772; that is, the difference of 2.668 in favor of Treatment 1 is significant
From these results it can be established:
Discussion and Conclusions
The results of this research show that it is technically feasible to produce flour from the pulp of coffee harvested in El Salvador, at different heights, and regardless of the pulping method; although the dry method yields lower pounds. Previous work demonstrated the usefulness of the pulp in the manufacture of honey and a flour of similar characteristics.
Either wet or dry pulping would not require additional investment beyond what is already in place. Eliminating moisture through drying prevents deterioration of the pulp, maintaining its shelf quality as a raw material for a longer period of time than if it is left wet, as it tends to ferment and decompose at an accelerated rate. This has been verified by researchers such as Zactiti in 2004 and Ventura-Cruz in 2019.
Efforts to maintain pulp safety and quality could translate into alternatives to generate economic flows for producers and contribute to food security.
Prada and its associated researchers, in 2019 addressed the effectiveness of solar dryers with continuous airflow system applied to coffee drying, which undoubtedly accelerates the process. However, the traditional way has also shown favorable results. It will be a matter of available technology and market conditions that will tip the balance in favor of one of the two visions.
The awareness of sustainable production needs to be extended to the creation of consumption alternatives that contribute to natural resources and the environment. Torres' research corroborates that the use of coffee pulp reduces environmental impact and highlights the nutritional benefits it contains.
As a result of the work carried out, it was possible to establish the feasibility of making flour from coffee pulp, which is traditionally treated as a by-product that is discarded, and which entails environmental impacts, transportation and disposal costs. Taking advantage of coffee pulp implies an opportunity to expand the production chain, generate profits and food alternatives.
Regarding the amount of pulp obtained, it was found that, with a manual pulper and subsequent sun drying, a higher yield is obtained than with the process in which the coffee is first dried and then the pulp is obtained by threshing. In the case of the present study, 2.66 pounds more sun-dried pulp was obtained per 115-pound block than that obtained by stoving and threshing. The difference in performance is statistically significant.
From the application of the pulping methods, it was observed that the appearance of the flour is independent, i.e., applying one or the other method does not change the appearance and consistency of the flour
References
Garza Lau, Rubén, Maldonado Torres, Ranferi, Álvarez Sánchez, María Edna, & Buendía Espinoza, Julio César. (2020). Aporte nutrimental de especies arbóreas fijadoras de nitrógeno en sistemas agroforestales con café. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, 11(4), 801-814. Epub 13 de septiembre de 2021.https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i4.2465
Guevara-Sánchez, Maricely, Bernales del Águila, Carlos Ivan, Saavedra-Ramírez, Jorge, & Owaki-López, Johnny Jakson. (2019). Efecto de la altitud en la calidad del café (Coffea arabica L.): comparación entre secado mecánico y tradicional. Scientia Agropecuaria, 10(4), 505-510. https://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2019.04.07
Martínez-González, Mónica Elizabeth, Balois-Morales, Rosendo, Alia-Tejacal, Irán, Cortes-Cruz, Moises Alberto, Palomino-Hermosillo, Yolotzin Apatzingan, & López-Gúzman, Graciela Guadalupe. (2017). Poscosecha de frutos: maduración y cambios bioquímicos. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, 8(spe19), 4075-4087. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i19.674
Medina-Meléndez, José Alfredo, Ruiz-Nájera, Ramiro Eleazar, Gómez-Castañeda, Julio César, Sánchez-Yáñez, Juan Manuel, Gómez-Alfaro, Gabriela, & Pinto-Molina, Omar. (2016). Estudio del sistema de producción de café (Coffea arabica L.) en la región Frailesca, Chiapas. CienciaUAT, 10(2), 33-43. Recuperado en 04 de marzo de 2023, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-78582016000100033&lng=es&tlng=es.
Pérez-González, Jairo Roberto, Cárdenas-Cortés, Xiomy Carolina, Ocampo-Arias, Daniela, & Ceballos, Yony Fernando. (2022). Oportunidades de mejora para los procesos de recepción, fabricación y despacho de máquinas despulpadoras de café. Ingeniería, 27(3), e203. Epub November 11, 2022.https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.18314
Prad, Á., Vela, C. P., Bardález, G., & Saavedra, J. (2019). Efectividad de un Proceso de Secado de Café usando Secadores Solares con Sistema de Flujo de Aire Continuo Impulsado por Energía Fotovoltaica, en la Región San Martín, Perú. Información tecnológica, 30, 85-92.
Ramírez Vélez. (2013). Proceso para la obtención de miel y/o harina de café a partir de la pulpa o cascara y el mucilago del grano de café (Patent N.o A23F 5/02 (2006.01) A23N 12/00 (2006.01)). https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013088203A1/es.
Serna-Jiménez, Johanna Andrea, Torres-Valenzuela, Laura Sofía, Martínez-Cortínez, Katherine, & Hernández-Sandoval, María Camila. (2018). Aprovechamiento de la pulpa de café como alternativa de valorización de subproductos. Revista ION, 31(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.18273/revion.v31n1-2018006
SIFRE, Maria, PERAIRE, Manu, SIMÓ, Delfina, SEGURA, Amparo, SIMÓ, Pepita y TOSCA, Pepita. (2019). La harina. http://bibliotecavirtualsenior.es/investigacion/la-harina/.
Torres-Valenzuela, Laura S., Martínez, Katherine G., Serna-Jimenez, Johanna A., & Hernández, María C.. (2019). Secado de Pulpa de Café: Condiciones de Proceso, Modelación Matemática y Efecto sobre Propiedades Fisicoquímicas. Información tecnológica, 30(2), 189-200. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642019000200189
Valdés-Velarde, Eduardo, Vázquez-Domínguez, Laura Patrícia, Tinoco-Rueda, Juan Ángel, Sánchez-Hernández, Rufo, Salcedo-Pérez, Eduardo, & Lagunes-Fortiz, Erika. (2022). Servicio ecosistémico de carbono almacenado en cafetales bajo sombra en sistema agroforestal. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, 13(spe28), 287-297. Epub 13 de enero de 2023.https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i28.3283
Vargas-Tierras, Yadira Beatriz, Prado-Beltrán, Julia Karina, Nicolalde-Cruz, José Rogelio, Casanoves, Fernando, Virginio-Filho, Elias de Melo, & Viera-Arroyo, William Fernando. (2018). Characterization and role of Amazonian fruit crops in family farms in the provinces of Sucumbíos and Orellana (Ecuador). Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, 19(3), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol19_num3_art:812
Cervantes Beyra, Rafael, Castro-Lizazo, Iván, Mesa Pérez, María Aurora, Ocampo Ramírez, Arturo, Fernández Valdés, Daybelis, & Fernández Valdés, Dayvis. (2015). Efecto de la pulpa de Coffea arabica L. sobre la microflora de tres unidades de suelos. Revista de Protección Vegetal, 30(2), 115-122. Recuperado en 19 de marzo de 2023, de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-27522015000200005&lng=es&tlng=es.